User talk:Israell

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Israell:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 4900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheila Carter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Barton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General sanctions for Michael Jackson topic

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to Michael Jackson.
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.
Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Abhishek0831996 (talk) 04:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Material Gworrllllllll! (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A single Spotify link is nowhere near demonstrating notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Material Gworrllllllll! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 11:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Israell! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! eviolite (talk) 11:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was/am not done working on the draft. I resubmitted it w/ more references. Israell (talk) 11:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Material Gworrllllllll! has been accepted

Material Gworrllllllll!, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi israell , please i need your help to review a this wikipedia article for Haidar Miles i think it deserve to be accepted.thanks please find the link here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Haidar_Miles Kanawaedits (talk) 06:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Material Gworrllllllll! (Single Cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Material Gworrllllllll! (Single Cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blacklisted (Aaron Carter album) has been accepted

Blacklisted (Aaron Carter album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Israell (talk) 00:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Farrell

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NjyZo6oKaC0&pp=ygUlYm9iYnkgZmFycmVsbCBoZSBjb3VsZG4ndCBzaW5nIGEgd29yZA%3D%3D

Not a singer like Lou Rawls or Harry Bellafonte. But this video shows that it is not to say that he couldn't sing a word. His best singing rage in this video. He could handle a few sentences well with a deep,clear voice but not suitable for singing for a long time and so not to build up a carreer as a solo artist with live performances. His attempt to build up a solo carreer failed (1982) Musicworldvision (talk) 20:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Israell:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 4900 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC

I submitted the Shakeel Uzzaman Ansari’s draft, there was no notification when it was accepted why? — Quadrimobile(T · C 19:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of replacement of your ANI thread

Israell, this message is to inform you that I've consolidated your ANI complaint regarding the Nrq9/Magnesum77 dispute into the existing thread. In the future, where a filing has already been made about a given dispute/issues, please do not create a competing thread, but rather raise your concerns in the existing thread. Even if you feel that the original complaint comes from a bad actor, or just a community member who has identified the wrong party as problematic, discussion should be kept in the same place. A subsection for the thread is always an option if you think community consensus in the discussion up until that point has gotten the behavioural analysis wrong. SnowRise ^{let's rap} 01:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DRN

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the noticeboard regarding Dworin statement. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Michael Jackson".The discussion is about the topic Topic.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Hammelsmith (talk) 21:18, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Israell!

Happy New Year!

Israell,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 10:24, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 10:24, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year to you too! 😃 Israell (talk) 03:39, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

You have recently made edits related to discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. This is a standard message to inform you that discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. —Serial Number 54129^{(wake up Fortuna)} 13:43, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

You have recently made edits related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. This is a standard message to inform you that living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. —Serial Number 54129^{(wake up Fortuna)} 13:43, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom

You would probably be well advised to withdraw your submission to ArbCom. It will almost certainly be rejected as grossly premature and/or misplaced. ArbCom does not settle content disputes, and you have failed to show that there is any behavioural issue that can't be dealt with through normal processes. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:14, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

So, an RfC would be best? I was told that arbitration may be a better route. Thanks for the warning. Israell (talk) 15:17, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Who told you that? It looks like bad advice to me, since ArbCom won't make any ruling regarding content: an RfC would still be necessary. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:21, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

Hello! I pinged you to a discussion about a possible Rihanna RfC but spelled your user name wrong I think. Sorry. Here’s a link: Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment#c-Dw31415-20260320201700-Robert McClenon-20260320192700 Dw31415 (talk) 15:36, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration regarding "Rihanna's songwriter occupation"

Hello, Israell. In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has decided that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

For grievances about the conduct of a Wikipedia editor, you should approach the user (in a civil, professional way) on their user talk page. However, other mechanisms for resolving a dispute also exist, such as raising the issue at the administrators' noticeboard for incidents.

In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of the clerks if you have more questions. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 15:39, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. I already tried dispute resolution. I even had to file an edit-warring report (for breach of the three-revert rule). The talk page discussion, after four months, has become redundant as certain users now demand a level of details that is impossible to provide. I'm now seeking an RfC. Israell (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You tried DRN, and the other party declined to participate. You were then advised to try an RFC, and you made a request for assistance that was difficult to understand because it was mostly about what the other editor did. You apparently were also advised by someone to try arbitration, and you went ahead with a request for arbitration without asking anyone else whether that was a good idea. Some of us would be interested in who gave you bad advice. However, if you are receiving advice from different people and trying to take different advice at the same time, you can get your actions tied up in knots in different directions. That seems to be what you did, taking bad advice that conflicted with the advice you were getting. I would still like to know who gave you the bad advice, although I know that you probably won't say, because you may be relying on them for future bad advice. I am asking. However, I won't be ready to help you now, because you might rely on bad advice in the middle of following my advice. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:45, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, an editor told me that arbitration might be a better route. That editor told me that off-Wiki (off-Wiki convos are permitted as long as it's not for canvassing, sock-puppetry or meat-puppetry purposes). That said, after being told it was not such a good idea, I withdrew my request.

The problem here is that I've provided sufficient documentation for the inclusion of "songwriter" in the lede and infobox (the body of the article mentions Rihanna's songwriting, so there's more context), but that editor still persists in not allowing that inclusion. Why?

Billboard magazine literally calls Rihanna a "songwriter" [1]. The Academy Awards nominated Rihanna for music composition of the song "Lift Me Up" [2]. Rihanna once (alongside Future and DJ Khaled) won R&B/Hip-Hop Songwriter of the Year at the BMI R&B/Hip-Hop Awards [3]. American Songwriter published an article on five songs that Rihanna wrote for other artists [4]. And I've provided even more reliable sources, incl. multiple documentation that delves into Rihanna's songwriting process, esp. when it comes to lyrics.

But that editor and another editor now want a level of details that is impossible to provide such as what exactly Rihanna composed in "Lift Me Up." That song has two lyricists (excl. Rihanna) and four composers (incl. Rihanna). That, I can reliably state (and it passes WP:V). But I cannot state in detail what Rihanna composed in that piece of music. That's not how collaborative pop songwriting is documented! You can understand how that demand of those few editors is not reasonable.

As for their assumptions or hearsay that Rihanna generally only writes one word or one line to get a songwriting credit, that's pure speculation, and that goes against WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. It is not proper for the editing of that article to be based on such speculation. It is honestly not proper!

And there's the documented fact that Rihanna now has over 130 songwriting credits (excl. duplicates) [5]. Israell (talk) 02:12, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is no point whatsoever in arguing about this here. That is what the article talk page is for. If that fails, we have dispute resolution processes - including RfC. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:20, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've stated all of that on the article talk page already, but they don't care! They insist of pushing their personal POV that Rihanna is not a "true" songwriter and that her songwriting credits are bogus, and they insist I provide documentation that is not publicly available.

The exact same thing unfolded on the Beyoncé article years ago. Some editors insisted of pushing their personal POV that Beyoncé was not a "true" songwriter and that her songwriting credits were bogus. It took an RfC just to readd "songwriter" to the lede and infobox.

I am currently looking into the RfC. Thanks for your assistance. Israell (talk) 02:31, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions in the Rihanna songwriter "discussion" are/were excellent

The rationalizations (for credit-denial) people were throwing around were transparently ridiculous, and part of racism/sexism since the credit/title-denial thing doesn't happen for certain other figures. Your links to sources were good and your explanation of the point(s) were great.RandomEditor6772314 (talk) 21:38, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I sincerely agree w/ your points. Israell (talk) 02:34, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration: Michael Jackson

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Michael Jackson and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, BilledMammal (talk) 02:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 1993 Michael Jackson sexual abuse allegations

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1993 Michael Jackson sexual abuse allegations, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Case opened

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Michael Jackson. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Michael Jackson/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 1, 2026 at 23:59 UTC, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Michael Jackson/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, ~delta _{{talk • cont • 🇰🇷 • 🎢}} 22:13, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Michael Jackson closed

An arbitration case, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Michael Jackson, has been now closed. The final decision is available at the link above.

The following remedies have been passed regarding this case:

TruthGuardians (talk · contribs), TheWikiholic (talk · contribs), Guitarjunkie22 (talk · contribs), Jimcastor (talk · contribs), and MraClean (talk · contribs) are indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed six months after the enactment of this remedy, and every six months thereafter.

TruthGuardians (talk · contribs), TheWikiholic (talk · contribs), Israell (talk · contribs), Episteme Aletheia (talk · contribs), Guitarjunkie22 (talk · contribs), Jimcastor (talk · contribs), Mr Boar1 (talk · contribs), MraClean (talk · contribs), Never17 (talk · contribs), and PinkSlippers (talk · contribs) are indefinitely topic banned from Michael Jackson, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed six months after the enactment of this remedy, and every six months thereafter.

NE0mAn7o! (talk · contribs) is warned that future misconduct in the Michael Jackson topic area will result in restrictions under the Michael Jackson community contentious topic.

For the Arbitration Committee, ~delta _{{talk • cont • 🇰🇷 • 🎢}} 21:16, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Michael Jackson closed