User talk:Fylindfotberserk/Archives/2025/July

Removing Brahmin entries

Hello. I notice that you removed all my entries on the article List of Brahmins. Please note that many of these entries are sons, daughters and relatives of peoples who were already on this page. Also, many of these artists are confirmed as Brahmins on their Wikipedia page, or on their parents's wikipedia page (such as Rani Mukerji, Kajol, Rekha, Lata Mangeshkar, Asha Bhosle, Kishore Kumar, Anupam Kher, etc. Not to mention that many family names are self-explanatory. People whose last names are Mukherjee, Chaterjee, Raina, Bhachatariya, Kulkarni, Pandit, Iyer, Iyengar, etc.. are automatically considered as Brahmin. Please add the mention _citation needed_ instead of plain removal. Many thanks. Bigdoul (talk) 19:04, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Bigdoul: Not a comment on your additions but please note that we only include the social group of individuals if they self-identify as such. In other words, the son or daughter of a Brahmin is not automatically assumed to be a Brahmin (they might, for example, not to want to be identified in that way). RegentsPark (comment) 19:08, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

@Bigdoul: We follow WP:CASTEID (self-identification), no exceptions. What if the living relatives of a dead person doesn't identify with the caste? Besides you haven't inlcuded references for the dead ones either. I added back Anupam Kher with an interview source were he mentions his Kashmiri Pandit heritage. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:35, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Malicious account

I have noticed that you have reverted several disruptive edits made by this editor, and have recently gave warning with the account in question. I would like to highlight that the edit linked above is not merely a violation of the common name policy—it constitutes a serious case of vandalism. The user changed the name of one of India’s major football clubs, Mohun Bagan Super Giant, to Mohun Bagan Sonagachi Giant, deliberately referencing Sonagachi, a well-known red-light district in Kolkata. This edit is clearly disparaging, offensive, and intended to defame.

Additionally, the behavior and editing pattern of this account bear a strong resemblance to that of Chincong999, a previously blocked user who was blocked for reasons including vandalism, violation of the username policy, and insulting other editors in edit summaries. Given the nature and intent of the edits, I believe this account should be reported promptly. Chanchaldm2 (talk) 12:26, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

@Chanchaldm2: I reverted them for violating WP:COMMONNAME. Didn't notice the exact kind of vandalism, so thanks for the info. As for the SPI, could you link diffs here. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:38, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Discussion related Kamboj article.

hello sir @Fylindfotberserk Hope you'll doing well, actually in the article, the information intered was correct, but i think I've made a mistake after deleting some of the information which was before the article (the wrong informationi had deleted). So i request you to, allow me to edit the article, ill maintain the Wikipedia rules ang regulations and ill not delete any information which is in the article. Thank you --Kambojahistory (talk) 02:38, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

The article was locked by an admin. The information maybe correct may be not, but the source is deemed unreliable in Wikipedia, hence we cannot use it in Wikipedia. You need to find post-Indian Independence WP:SCHOLARLY sources for the purpose and discuss in the talk page for WP:CONSENSUS. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:01, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

hey sir thank you so much to lead me, I'm here with one source

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=bfAMAQAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=ks+singh+people+of+india&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Kamboj%20&f=false

Please check 1392 and 1393, in that you will clearly see the information that i was adding in the article.(Rajput,surajbansi,raghuvanshi etc.) Kambojahistory (talk) 14:42, 29 July 2025 (UTC)